Friday, June 3, 2011
A Prayer to the God of Ebb and Flow
Monday, May 2, 2011
On the Death of our Enemy
My next reaction came when seeing gritty images of bin Laden's face on the TV screen, for the first time realizing that he was now no longer able to do any harm. Amazingly, I noticed that, sure enough, he had two eyes, a nose, and a mouth just like mine. Heck... we even both have beards. I'd half expected his teeth to be pointy and horns to be coming out of his head, but it was not the case. I was reminded again that he, too, is human. And as such he bears the image of God. And instead of thinking about our vast differences, I began to contemplate our similarities. I have no doubt that Osama and I might find dinner conversation difficult. Aside from the language barrier, I'm guessing he might not be too interested in disc golf or the St. Louis Cardinals or great fiction. But he eats food. And so do I. And we could have done that together.
Is it good that Osama is now dead? I don't know. I don't think it really matters what my opinion is. Millions rejoice. I'm not quite confident enough to join in their gatherings. Instead, I see one more dead man, one more condemned sinner like myself. I really don't want to enter the grand debates over foreign policy. I just want to lament the death of one human being who was made in the image of God like myself -- even if this death was for the greater good (to use popular American utilitarian language).
Of all the words being spread across the internet this morning, the most radical that I've come across and the ones that have given me the most pause are from a document many thousands of years old. "Say to them, 'As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign LORD, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn from their ways and live. Turn! Turn from your evil ways! Why will you die, O house of Israel?' (Ezekiel 33:11). Do we delight in the death of the wicked? Many are doing so today and maybe I'd be one of them if my own parent or spouse had been killed on 9/11. Nevertheless, I can't help but think that Jesus would even today instruct me to forgive, to let go of my hate, and to allow vengeance to rest in the hands of Almighty God rather than the hands of men in uniform. For God's justice is always perfect.
And so I sit at my computer with a mixture of feelings. Relief. Hope that we're entering a new and less militant chapter of human history. And also earnest prayer for the soul of one who is now at the bottom of the sea.
Saturday, April 23, 2011
The Day In Between
There is great wisdom in the ancient Christian tradition that reminds us to live through Saturday before getting to Sunday. Today is "the day in between." It is often overlooked. We fail to pause and soak up the total despair of this moment -- our hero has been defeated, the enemy has won. We cry out with Job on this day, "As waters fail from a lake, and a river wastes away and dries up, so mortals lie down and do not rise again." Death seems the victor. And although today we know the Story, we know what's coming tomorrow morning, we know that soon we will be dressed in white surrounded by springtime and Easter lilies and shouts of praise, nevertheless today we wear black. We veil our faces with Mary and Thomas and John and the rest. Today we stare into the face of Sheol and ponder the words of Ecclesiates, "Meaningless, meaningless, everything is meaningless." The dark existentialist takes a strange comfort in this black Saturday because this, too, is part of the Christian year, part of our Scriptures, and part of life. Without experiencing the pain and shock of Friday followed by the emptiness and despair of Saturday, we'll never fully appreciate Sunday. So let's not rush there... although we might want to. Instead, let's live out this black Saturday as the first disciples did. Maybe then we will appreciate what happens very early in the morning tomorrow...
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Book Review: Chuck Gutenson's "Christians and the Common Good"
Saturday, April 16, 2011
Bishops Forum
Things to celebrate:
1) A renewed emphasis on being missional. The church doesn't have a mission; the mission of God has a church. I think our bishops understand that. They want us to be increasingly outward-focused rather than maintaining our tradition of being a "holy huddle."
2) A call to embrace ethnic diversity in our ministries. My favorite moment of the evening was when Lead Bishop David Kendall stated very matter-of-factly, "We are a white church. We are homogeneous. And we need to change that." Such honesty is refreshing from our leadership.
3) An emphasis on networking and reaching today's youth culture.
4) An emphasis on the need for the church to return to its roots: raising the standard of holiness and preaching the good news to the poor. I see the divide between social justice and personal piety being bridged and I am thrilled to witness it.
5) A refusal to get in bed with the religious right. This is really big. For so long Free Methodism has been part of the Republican Party. I no longer hear that coming from our leadership (although it remains strong among many laity and clergy). I truly believe the bishops want to allow for a diversity of opinions on this matter and refuse to play partisan politics any longer.
Concerns:
1) We still seem to be immersed in the Pastor-as-CEO model (or Bishop). This didn't come out in the forum, but you can see that more and more decisions in the church are being made by fewer and fewer people. The fact that the General Conference delegations will only have ONE DAY to discuss business matters reveals the fact that more decisions are being made behind closed doors.
2) We are still dominated by pragmatism. Whatever works is seen as best. I find this contrary to Scripture.
3) We're not going far enough in embracing God's preferential option for the poor. We are on our way, but it still remains an "add-on" in our theology rather than central to it.
I would love to hear your feedback. You can read an article about the event here: Townhall Meeting or view the actual event here: Video of the event
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Taking a break...
Friday, February 11, 2011
Exhausting Goodness
"For most of my adult life, what I have wanted most to win is nearness
to God. This led me to choose a vocation that marked me as God's
person both in my eyes and in the eyes of others. I gave myself to
the work the best way I knew how, which sometimes exhausted my
parishioners as much as it exhausted me. I thought that being
faithful meant always trying harder to live a holier life and calling
them to do the same. I thought that it meant knowing everything I
could about Scripture and theology, showing up every time the church
doors were open, and never saying no to anyone in need. I thought
that it meant ignoring my own needs and those of my family until they
went away altogether, leaving me free to serve God without any selfish
desires to drag me down.
I thought that being faithful was about becoming someone other than
who I was, in other words, and it was not until this project failed
that I began to wonder if my human wholeness might be more useful to
God than my exhausting goodness."
- Barbara Brown Taylor in "Leaving Church"
I'm not to the place where I feel like I can give up on the striving and effort, but I wish I was. I think there is a deep spiritual truth in these words from someone far more experienced and wise than myself.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Thug Musings
Friday, December 17, 2010
Living Under Sharia Law
Below is an exchange I am having with a close friend of mine. I'll be sure to add his responses to this post as they come. I think it may be of interest to many who wrestle with issues of faithfulness to the the way of Christ in our post-9/11 world.
Friend:
Alright... I've been pondering this for some time and can't quite sort it out. I'd lik
e your take on
it so I can gauge if I'm sliding in the wrong direction... :-P (thought I'd start it off with a quick jab). What do you believe a western hemisphere Christian's response should be to Islam's rapidly expanding Jihad (violence and/or politically) that seeks to ultimately establish their Sharia law as universal as Mohamed prophesied and commanded?
My response:
That's a fair question, friend! And it certainly deserves to be taken seriously. I'll give some initial thoughts and then be eager to hear your response. (Let's hope this can be a respectful dialog rather than what some of our former facebook exchanges have been like... and I'm not just blaming you there). First, I need to say that I don't think you'll find my answers very satisfactory because we have some radically different theological assumptions and biblical interpretations, but I'll at least be honest to answer from my own perspective -- which is all I can do.
I would start by questioning how really serious the threat you mentioned actually is. I know that there are some Islamic radicals who hold the views you describe, but I think they are a very small minority. The vast majority of the Muslim world does not read the Qur'an in the way that Osama bin Laden, et al. do. I think there is a lot of fear-mongering out there in the media that points to the most radical opinions on earth and then claims them to be more widespread than they actually are. Look at a nation like Turkey -- an almost completely Islamic nation, but I think you'll find radical attitudes about Sharia law very rare throughout that entire nation. I believe that the vast majority of Muslims are peace-loving people and that violent jihad is only one interpretation that a few radicals cling to. Of course, you could dispute this, but I think the very fact that there are nearly a billion Muslims in our world set next to the relatively few acts of terrorism perpetrated by those billion people indicates that terrorism in the the name of jihad is the position of an extreme minority. Most Muslim scholars insist that Islam is a religion that values peace... and I agree.
But with that aside, I do think we need to be concerned about that small minority that see it as their religious duty to kill the infidels. (You could point to recent Irish history in which Protestants and Catholics had the same views for one another, by the way. So Christians are not immune to this disease of hatred.) In one sense, I think that the nation-state will do what the nation-state will do. It will spend enormous amounts of money in order to protect us, it will fight its preemptive wars, it will do its wire taps... and there isn't a whole lot I can do about all of that as an individual person. So in a sense I think my opinion about how the government should act is something of a moot point.
In my own worldview, however, I believe that at the very center of all of creation is a bleeding, suffering Lamb. The fabric of the universe --real reality -- is disclosed in the cross and the non-violence that the cross reveals about the heart of God. Think about this. The first three hundred years of Christianity were lived under the thumb of an oppressive, pagan empire that demanded worship of false gods. Christians in those centuries saw it as their duty to primarily remain faithful witnesses (the Greek is "martyrios" from which we get "martyr") in the face of empire. They did not see their job to be to seize governmental power, infiltrate the senate, and legislate policies that would direct Rome into a "Christian nation." That would have been unthinkable and, even if it were possible, many would have said that it shouldn't be done in the first place. Instead, they believed their role was to live out the radical, non-violent love of Jesus even at the cost of their very lives. And by doing so they bore witness to the Lamb Who Was Slain. They stood apart from the empire precisely in the fact that they refused to take up the sword even when their lives were threatened. To participate in the violence of the world would be to deny the gospel itself -- or so Christians thought in those days.
Now suppose (worst case scenario and all of the fear-mongers' predictions come true) that radical Muslims conquer America and force us to abide by Sharia Law (although I can't see that happening anytime soon). What would my response be? Of course, I would lament the removal of my political freedoms. But it would not change my faithfulness to the way of Jesus in the least. I would see my life as a recapitulation of those Christians in the first centuries of our faith. I might be persecuted, I might die, but it would be an opportunity to show my oppressors the radical love of Jesus that refuses to return violence with violence. And that, in light of eternity, is completely worth it. And talk about being an evangelical witness! Such a response would certainly strike the hearts of many Muslims!
In other words, the nations will war with one another. Empires will come and go. America may or may not remain the power over me for the remainder of my life... but my responsibility to walk in the pattern of Jesus, to turn the other cheek, to put away my sword, to not take revenge but instead leave room for God's wrath, to suffer alongside the suffering Lamb -- will all remain the same.
I realize this view is a very radical answer and might seem way "out of the box" in light of current political debates and theories. But, in my own interpretation, it is more faithful to Scripture than engaging in the games of the powers and principalities of this dark world. I think when Constantine established the Holy Roman Empire in 313 AD, the purity of the church was deeply wounded. We're still living with his decision to wed worldly military power with the Christian faith. I reject that marriage as an impure version of The Way. And for a far more articulate manifesto on what I've just stated, I would refer you to John Howard Yoder's radical book "The Politics of Jesus" or some secondary sources on his thought.
In short, I'm not going to loose any sleep over those few Islamic fanatics out there. Not because they don't pose a threat, but because the way I will choose to live under the guidance of the gospel will not change even if they DO threaten my way of life.
I hope that makes a little bit of sense to you. I think the fundamental questions that we need to be asking are, "What is the gospel? What implications does it have on my relationship to the political world? Could the current Constantinian wedding of state power and faith be harmful? And do I really believe that perfect love drives out all fear?"
I'll be delighted to hear your response and am certainly open to your disagreements. I promise to consider your opinions seriously if you do the same for me.
Grace and Peace,
Greg

